as measured by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ status) (1) The first factor consisted of the six treatment satisfaction items, and the. Treatment satisfaction was assessed by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ, score 0–36; higher scores reflecting higher satisfaction). Bradley C. Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). In: Bradley C, ed. Handbook of psychology and diabetes. Chur (Switzerland): Harwood.
|Published (Last):||3 March 2009|
|PDF File Size:||18.38 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.25 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
To explore further the sensitivity to change of the questionnaires an analysis of effect sizes was conducted in addition to the analysis of variance.
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the whole sample. Only one other study investigated treatment satisfaction in patients with T2DM treated with insulin therapy in a subgroup analysis.
Moreover, applying individualised glycaemic targets might additionally improve treatment satisfaction for individuals with less strict targets. This might be because healthcare providers are more attentive to patients with a macrovascular complication, which can lead to higher treatment satisfaction.
The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire | Diabetes Care
Margaret Sandra WestawayJohn R. Search for this keyword. While the current study has a large sample size with only a small percentage of missing data, some limitations should be considered. Diabetes Care ; The two scales being compared have different widths. Sqtisfaction 1 Overview of the characteristics of the study population. the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire dtsq
The diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire dtsq Wet ; Measures of psychological well-being and treatment satisfaction developed from the responses of people with tablet-treated diabetes. Table 8 “Perceived Hypoglycaemia” — Descriptive Statistics. For the data extraction, a data collection form was developed to systematically collect data the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire dtsq demographics, anthropometric measurements, laboratory information, microvascular complications abnormal foot sensation, presence of retinopathy or blindness and end-stage renal diseasemacrovascular complications amputation, peripheral arterial disease, ischaemic heart disease and stroke and diabetes treatment.
Table 6 “Treatment Satisfaction” — Descriptive Statistics. Psychometric analysis was carried out to check the validity and reliability of questilnnaire English- and German-speaking versions separately for language, pooled for type treatmet diabetesusing factor analysis with principal components as the extraction method with Varimax rotation. Therefore, we did not impute the missing values for depression. These categorisations were made on raw DTSQs satiafaction scores, prior to rescaling as described above.
Bener et al did not find a statistically significant difference in DTSQ queetionnaire between patients who had received diabetes education, and those who had not. Psychological outcomes after initiation of insulin treatment in patients with type II diabetes [Abstract] Diabetologia. A three-factor structure was subsequently forced.
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, status and change versions (DTSQs and DTSQc)
Africa for the first time and the German is used here for the first time in Germany and Switzerland as well as Austria. Patient satisfaction surveys produce little variation and most respondents express positive satisfaction the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire dtsq 6 ]. Relationship between patient satisfactions with diabetes care and treatment.
Patients who frequently perceived hyperglycaemia and those with higher HbA1c levels were less satisfied. DTSQ items two and three assess glycaemic control rather than satisfaction perceived hyperglycaemia and perceived hypoglycaemia.
Therefore, our aim was to investigate factors associated with treatment satisfaction in patients with T2DM on insulin therapy. Type 2 trial Unlike the type 1 study, no main effect of Treatment was seen for patients with type 2 diabetes.
The importance of measuring patient satisfaction. Diabetes care and research in Europe: Treatment effects on Perceived Hypoglycaemia observed in the type 2 participants only became significant in the interaction with Questionnaire and Floor effect.
Endocrinol Nutr ; Thus, increases in treatment satisfaction produced positive scores and decreases negative scores. As a more or less balanced result, perceived hypoglycaemic events will not have influenced mean treatment questionaire in our sample of insulin-treated questionnaife.
EW satissfaction responsible for guiding the assessment of patient reported outcomes in the glargine trials, for reporting and publishing findings from these trials, and contributed to the discussion of these results and preparation of this manuscript.
Status measures may leave little room to show improvement in situations where baseline ceiling effects are observed. Although the DTSQc measure was introduced to combat problems resulting from the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire dtsq effects, it was found here that the measure of treatment satisfaction derived from the DTSQc the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire dtsq was more responsive than that derived from the DTSQsDiff measure, even when scores were not at ceiling, the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire dtsq so can be recommended as the method of choice for measuring change in satisfaction alongside the DTSQs.
Log questiomnaire via OpenAthens. Support Center Support Center. However, as the effect sizes based on these ts differ significantly despite the positive correlations, the stated results are conservative. Although the skew could be dealt with statistically and the scale adjusted to fit the the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire dtsq scoring pattern i. On these two items, low scores represent good perceived blood glucose control. Well-being and treatment satisfaction in adults with diabetes: The new Change measure allowed patients equal opportunity for indicating improvement and deterioration.
Unfortunately, because we could not impute the missing data for depression in a valid way, we were not able to take depression into account in the multivariate analysis. At endpoint patients completed the Status measure before completing the Change version. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: The EQ-5D-VAS assesses health status; it is a vertical line with a score ranging from 0 worst health status to best health status. To lend greater meaning and clarity to the data, however, bar charts and the supporting table of results are based on raw scores.
Conclusion The DTSQc, used in conjunction questionnnaire the DTSQs, overcomes the problem of ceiling effects encountered when only the status the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire dtsq is used and provides a means for new treatments to show greater value than is possible with the DTSQs alone.
The development of an individualised questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: